Is Index Investing Really Passive?

Wallstreet terms index investing as a passive strategy. But is investing in an index fund truly passive? Personally, I don’t think so.

The finance community often use the term “passive investing” to apply to investing in index funds. But is investing in an index fund really a “passive” strategy?

Actually not.

Most indexes actually have an active method of selecting their stocks. For example, the S&P 500 only includes the top 500 stocks by market capitalisation that are listed and headquartered in the USA. In addition, the stocks need to have at least four consecutive quarters of profitability.

The S&P 500 is also market-cap weighted. As such, bigger companies have a larger weight in the S&P 500 index, and their returns have a bigger impact on the index’s overall return.

I consider this method of selection and weighting as an active method of selecting stocks. Moreover, the selection criteria are determined by a committee and the committee also has the final say on whether a stock should be included in the index. This was the case for Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA), which was only included after it reported its fifth profitable quarter (instead of fourth).

Portfolio weighting

Ultimately, these active decisions made by a committee impact the index’s returns. For instance, the simple act of choosing to weight the index based on market cap has had a profound impact on the S&P 500 index over the last 10 years.

The table below shows the returns of the S&P 500 index against the S&P 500 equal-weighted index.

Source: My compilation from data from S&P

As you can see, the market-cap weighted index far outpaced the equal-weighted one. This is because larger stocks, which have a bigger weighting in the market-cap-weighted index, have outperformed their smaller counterparts over the last 10 years.

Choosing the right index 

All of which points to the fact that not all indexes are made equal.

Each index has specific selection criteria and a specific method of weighting its constituent stocks. Ultimately, these are active choices made by the committee building the index. 

As investors, we may think that “index investing” is a passive strategy.

But indexes are not completely passive. The stocks within an index have been picked based on criteria that are “actively” chosen.

Even in Singapore, the Straits Times Index (STI), which is a commonly used indicator of the health of Singapore’s stock market, may not be truly representative or passive.

The rules for inclusion into the STI are based on a stock’s market cap, liquidity, and a minimum amount of voting rights in public hands. As such, the stocks selected in the STI are actually picked by the committee based on a selection methodology that they have actively chosen.

Index investing is actually “active”

Ultimately, investing in any index is not a truly passive way to invest. The exposure you gain is based on active decisions made by the index committee that built the index.

In addition, with so many indexes available, choosing an index to invest in is also an active decision made by the investor. Within the US alone, there are funds that track the S&P 500, S&P 500 Equal Weight, MSCI USA, MSCI USA Equal Weighted Indexes, and many more. Each of these indexes has performed differently over the last 10 years.

Index investing is, hence, not truly “passive”.

By investing in any index, you are actually making an “active” decision that the “active” selection and weight criteria used in that particular index will work best for your investment needs.

Disclaimer: The Good Investors is the personal investing blog of two simple guys who are passionate about educating Singaporeans about stock market investing. By using this Site, you specifically agree that none of the information provided constitutes financial, investment, or other professional advice. It is only intended to provide education. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or even your personal life. I currently do not have a vested interest in the shares of any companies mentioned. Holdings are subject to change at any time.

6 thoughts on “Is Index Investing Really Passive?”

  1. … there are solid technical reasons why an market cap weighted approach is more appropriate than other (price / equal) weighting methods…

  2. So, are there any true “passive” investing? Or do you think it is just some nice sounding words which wall street created to sell their index funds?

    1. Hi Jason, thanks for reading. I think there’s a spectrum between active and passive investing. The fewer active decisions being made by the investor and the fund’s investment committee, the more passive the strategy is. For now, even though I don’t consider investing in an index completely passive investing, it is still one of the more passive strategies we have available now.

  3. Well.. buying an index is still more passive than stock-picking since the ‘active’ action you described is not performed by the investor. Many people overlook that time = money. I’ll rather buy into an index, some simple bonds, and spend my spare time watching Netflix. Yes, I’m a Boglehead boomer AF. 🤣🤣🤣

    1. Hi Hong Yang,
      Thanks for reading.
      Totally agree. Buying an index is still a more passive investing strategy than stock picking as there are fewer active actions being made.

      And the strategy has worked very well despite being a more hands-off approach (if you invested in the US or global indexes, not so much Singapore’s).

Comments are closed.