What We’re Reading (Week Ending 31 May 2020)

The best articles we’ve read in recent times on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

We’ve constantly been sharing a list of our recent reads in our weekly emails for The Good Investors.

Do subscribe for our weekly updates through the orange box in the blog (it’s on the side if you’re using a computer, and all the way at the bottom if you’re using mobile) – it’s free!

But since our readership-audience for The Good Investors is wider than our subscriber base, we think sharing the reading list regularly on the blog itself can benefit even more people. The articles we share touch on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

Here are the articles for the week ending 31 May 2020:

1. We Need To Talk About Ergodicity – Joe Wiggins

A system is deemed ergodic if the expected value of an activity performed by a group is the same as for an individual carrying out the same action over time.  Rolling a dice is an example of an ergodic system.  If 500 people roll a fair six-sided dice once, the expected value is the same as if I alone roll a fair six-sided dice 500 times.

The Russian roulette example is a non-ergodic system.  The expected value of the group differs sharply to the average of an individual carrying out the action through time.  In the group situation the average outcome is to live and become wealthy.  As an individual performing the activity through time – on average – I am dead.  In a non-ergodic system the group expected value is deeply misleading as it pertains to individual experience.

Although these may seem like somewhat frivolous examples, the concept of ergodicity is incredibly important.  Much of classical economics assumes about human behaviour is founded on the expected average outcome of the group (see Expected Utility Theory).  This works under the assumption that most environments or situations are ergodic, when in fact this is not the case.

2. Not even wrong: ways to predict tech – Ben Evans

A lot of really important technologies started out looking like expensive, impractical toys. The engineering wasn’t finished, the building blocks didn’t fit together, the volumes were too low and the manufacturing process was new and imperfect. In parallel, many or even most important things propose some new way of doing things, or even an entirely new thing to do. So it doesn’t work, it’s expensive, and it’s silly. It’s a toy. 

Some of the most important things of the last 100 years or so looked like this – aircraft, cars, telephones, mobile phones and personal computers were all dismissed.

But on the other hand, plenty of things that looked like useless toys never did become anything more. 

This means that there is no predictive value in saying ‘that doesn’t work’ or ‘that looks like a toy’ – and that there is also no predictive value in saying ‘people always say that’. As Pauli put it, statements like this are ‘not even wrong’ – they give no insight into what will happen. You have to go one level further. You have to ask ‘do you have a theory for why this will get better, or why it won’t, and for why people will change their behaviour, or for why they won’t’?

3. My Son’s Entrepreneurship Journey – Investment Pilgrim

In Primary 4, he and his classmates started playing this traditional local game called “kuti kuti” where each player will control a small plastic animal. Each player is to maneuver his/her animal around the table with the aim of resting his/her animal over the other player’s animal. Once that is done, the game is won and the winner takes possession of the loser’s animal. This was very much like how I used to play the flag erasers with my friends when I was younger.

He started playing with large plastic animals. One weekend, he was out with his maternal grandfather when he saw a pack of the plastic animals selling for $2.50 for a pack of 10. He bought the pack, or his grandfather did anyway, and brought his new toys to school. He managed to sell each plastic animal for $1! In a few days, he sold all of them. Pretty good margin, lol.

He did not tell me any of this until it was over. When I found out about his transgressions away from school work, I did what any responsible parent would do. I laid down the law.

“Son, I need to tell you that your school work is the most important thing for you at this point.”

Pause.

“I’d also like you to think about growing this business.”

4. The Fourth Great Unlock – Scott Galloway

Jeff Bezos, at the outset of their earnings call, warned shareholders they “may want to take a seat.” He has done this several times. “This” is snatching profits from the jaws of shareholders to reinvest in the firm. With the exception of Netflix, no firm has been given this much runway. Bezos has used every foot of it to set aloft a vessel that nobody will likely catch. Imagine a Spruce Goose but at twice the speed of sound.

Bezos told investors that the $4 billion in profits they were expecting would be reinvested. The investment had a theme: Covid-19. Specifically, Bezos outlined a vision for at-home Covid tests, plasma donors, PPE equipment, distancing, additional compensation, and protocols to adapt to a new world. Jeff Bezos is developing the earth’s first “vaccinated” supply chain.

The genius here is breathtaking. Walmart can’t follow, as they don’t own their distribution for last-mile commerce. Outside of Walmart, few firms have the balance sheet to pull this off. Maybe FedEx, UPS, or Prologis? But it’s unlikely they could make this sort of investment, this fast — it would be perceived as reckless.

5. The Epic Games Primer: Parts I-VI Directory – Matthew Ball & Jacob Novak

Epic Games was founded by Tim Sweeney and Mark Rein in 1991. Sweeney is the CEO and majority/controlling shareholder, while Tencent owns roughly 40%. As a private company, Epic does not publicly disclose its financials. According to press reports, it was valued at roughly $15B in 2018 (when it last raised capital) and is currently raising more at a “significantly higher” price, per Bloomberg. 

Compared to Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Google, which are worth $600B to $1.4T, Epic’s valuation is modest. However, Epic has the potential to become one of the largest, most influential tech companies in the world. This might seem hyperbolic to those who know Epic only as the marker of the hit video game Fortnite: Battle Royale. In fact, even long-time fans of Epic’s games might find such a pronouncement odd given Fortnite has generated more revenue in three years than the rest of Epic has in almost as many decades. But behind the scenes, it looks increasingly likely that Epic will be at the very center of society’s digital future. 

6. Uncertainty II – Howard Marks

By definition, people who lack the expertise in a given field required for superior judgments also lack the expertise required to assess their level of expertise.  As I mentioned, they qualify as John Kenneth Galbraith’s forecasters “who don’t know they don’t know.”

While re-reading my memo, I realized I had left out an important further ramification.  Not only do most people fail to possess superior expertise – as well as the ability to know it – but they also lack the ability to figure out who does have it.  That’s the catch: you may have to be an expert in a field in order to be able to figure out who the true experts are.  That’s why research in most fields is subjected to “peer review,” meaning a review by experts, (not to be confused with “a jury of one’s peers,” meaning other lay citizens)…

… Nowadays, like everyone else, I’m bombarded with conflicting views regarding the wisdom of rapidly reopening the U.S. economy.  Yet I recognize that not only is my opinion on that topic of little value, but I also don’t have the expertise required to know for sure whose opinion does count. What I do know is that the last thing I should do is choose an expert because his or her opinions agree with mine, and allow confirmation bias to affect my decision…

… So (a) true expertise is scarce and limited in scope, (b) expertise and predictive ability are two different things, and (c) we all should be careful about whom we listen to and how much weight we give to their pronouncements.

What we probably don’t realize is that walking can be a kind of a behavioral preventive against depression. It benefits us on many levels, physical and psychological. Walking helps to produce protein molecules in muscle and brain that help repair wear and tear. These muscle and brain molecules—myokines and neurotrophic factors, respectively—have been intensively studied in recent years for their health effects. We are discovering that they act almost as a kind of fertilizer that assists in the growth of cells and regulation of metabolism. They also reduce certain types of inflammation.

These essential molecules are produced by movement and the increased brain and body activity created by movement. If you’re not moving about, placing heart and muscle under a bit of positive stress and strain, these molecules aren’t produced in sufficient quantities to perform their roles.

7. If Robots Steal So Many Jobs, Why Aren’t They Saving Us Now? – Matt Simon

Modern Capitalism has never seen anything quite like the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. In a matter of months, the deadly contagious bug has spread around the world, hobbling any economy in its path. In the United States, where consumer spending accounts for more than two-thirds of economic activity, commerce has come to a standstill as people stay home to slow the virus’ spread. Hotels and restaurants and airlines have taken massive hits; Delta has cut its flight capacity by 70 percent. One in five US households has already lost work. And that’s all because of the vulnerabilities of the human worker. When we get sick—or we have to shelter in place to avoid getting sick—the work that depends on people grinds to a stop.

Why haven’t the machines saved us yet?

This economic catastrophe is blowing up the myth of the worker robot and AI takeover. We’ve been led to believe that a new wave of automation is here, made possible by smarter AI and more sophisticated robots. San Francisco has even considered a tax on robots—replace a human with a machine, and pay a price. The problem will get so bad, argue folks like former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, we’ll need a universal basic income to support our displaced human workers. (UBI seems to have actually arrived, in a sense, with the Trump administration’s proposed payout to American households to weather the crisis: A $1,000 check for most, with an extra $500 for every child.)


Disclaimer: The Good Investors is the personal investing blog of two simple guys who are passionate about educating Singaporeans about stock market investing. By using this Site, you specifically agree that none of the information provided constitutes financial, investment, or other professional advice. It is only intended to provide education. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or even your personal life.

What We’re Reading (Week Ending 24 May 2020)

The best articles we’ve read in recent times on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

We’ve constantly been sharing a list of our recent reads in our weekly emails for The Good Investors.

Do subscribe for our weekly updates through the orange box in the blog (it’s on the side if you’re using a computer, and all the way at the bottom if you’re using mobile) – it’s free!

But since our readership-audience for The Good Investors is wider than our subscriber base, we think sharing the reading list regularly on the blog itself can benefit even more people. The articles we share touch on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

Here are the articles for the week ending 24 May 2020:

1. The Three Sides of Risk – Morgan Housel

At a conference a few months ago I was asked what skiing taught me about investing. This was on stage, where you can’t ponder your answer – you have to blurt out whatever you can think of.

I didn’t think skiing taught me anything about investing. But one incident came to mind…

…But it opened my eyes to the idea that there are three distinct sides of risk:

  • The odds you will get hit.
  • The average consequences of getting hit.
  • The tail-end consequences of getting hit.

The first two are easy to grasp. It’s the third that’s hardest to learn, and can often only be learned through experience.

But once you go through something like that, you realize that the tail-end consequences – the low-probability, high-impact events – are all that matter.

2. Doordash and Pizza Arbitrage – Ranjan Roy

In March 2019 a good friend who owns a few pizza restaurants messaged me (this friend has made appearances in prior Margins’ pieces). For over a decade, he resisted adding delivery as an option for his restaurants. He felt it would detract from focusing on the dine-in experience and result in trying to compete with Domino’s.

But he had suddenly started getting customers calling in with complaints about their deliveries.

Customers called in saying their pizza was delivered cold. Or the wrong pizza was delivered and they wanted a new pizza.

Again, none of his restaurants delivered.

He realized that a delivery option had mysteriously appeared on their company’s Google Listing. The delivery option was created by Doordash…

…. But he brought up another problem – the prices were off. He was frustrated that customers were seeing incorrectly low prices. A pizza that he charged $24 for was listed as $16 by Doordash…

… If someone could pay Doordash $16 a pizza, and Doordash would pay his restaurant $24 a pizza, then he should clearly just order pizzas himself via Doordash, all day long. You’d net a clean $8 profit per pizza

3. Mental Models – Oliver Sung

Surfing

You won’t be able to surf if you don’t catch the wave. And if you do catch it, you can stay on it for long. The trick is catching the one that lasts the longest as early as possible and not to get off. Microsoft was a result of a 16-year-old catching a wave of software revolution right on the edge.

Cockroach Theory

When bad news are revealed, there may be many more related negative events yet to be revealed. There’s never just one cockroach in the kitchen.

Minsky Moment

A sudden collapse of asset values marking the end of a credit cycle or an economic cycle.

Framing

The way a question or situation is framed can determine your response and lead to an action decided based on whether the options are presented with positive or negative connotations. Mixed with the narrative fallacy, framing can turn out dangerous for errors in decision making and might be used as power over other’s behavior.

Hindsight Bias

Also called creeping determinism, it’s the tendency of overestimating one’s ability to have predicted an outcome that could not possibly have been predicted. Hindsight bias is dangerous because it hinders one from learning from past mistakes. If we feel like we knew it all along, it means we won’t stop to examine why something really happened.

4. Our weird behavior during the pandemic is messing with AI models – Will Douglas Heaven

It took less than a week at the end of February for the top 10 Amazon search terms in multiple countries to fill up with products related to covid-19. You can track the spread of the pandemic by what we shopped for: the items peaked first in Italy, followed by Spain, France, Canada, and the US. The UK and Germany lag slightly behind. “It’s an incredible transition in the space of five days,” says Rael Cline, Nozzle’s CEO. The ripple effects have been seen across retail supply chains.

But they have also affected artificial intelligence, causing hiccups for the algorithms that run behind the scenes in inventory management, fraud detection, marketing, and more. Machine-learning models trained on normal human behavior are now finding that normal has changed, and some are no longer working as they should. 

5. Common Myths About the Federal Reserve – Cullen Roche

Myth #5 – The Fed “Manipulates” Interest Rates

It’s very common to hear that the Federal Reserve “manipulates interest rates”.  This is based on the idea that interest rates would be better “set” if they were controlled by a private market instead of a government entity like a Central Bank.  Unfortunately, this is based on a lack of understanding of banking and central banking.

A Central Bank is little more than a central clearinghouse where payments settle.  Before there were central banks payments between banks were settled at private clearinghouses.  The problem with this arrangement was that banks would stop settling payments during financial panics and this would exacerbate depressions.  A central bank leverages government powers to ensure that this doesn’t happen.  The 2008 financial crisis was a great example of this.  When private banks stopped lending to one another the Fed operated as the “lender of last resort”.  This meant that even though many banks were insolvent mom and pop could still buy necessities via the banking system because most banks didn’t stop operating thanks to the Fed’s backstop.  Had the Fed not lent to firms in need the crisis would have bankrupted even the largest banks and the economy would have certainly entered a substantially more catastrophic crisis.  You literally wouldn’t have been able to buy anything unless you had cash under your mattress.

In order to operate as a central clearinghouse the Fed needs to set an overnight rate at which it lends to banks.  Since the Fed requires most banks to utilize this system the banks naturally try to lend their reserve deposits which puts downward pressure on overnight interest rates.  Therefore, the natural rate of interest on overnight loans is 0% in the Fed Funds market.  This means the Fed actually has to manipulate rates HIGHER from this 0% rate. This is not theoretical, this is simply a mathematical reality of a system with a Fed Funds market in which banks operate within this closed system.

6. Why Walking Matters—Now More Than Ever – Shane O’Mara

What we probably don’t realize is that walking can be a kind of a behavioral preventive against depression. It benefits us on many levels, physical and psychological. Walking helps to produce protein molecules in muscle and brain that help repair wear and tear. These muscle and brain molecules—myokines and neurotrophic factors, respectively—have been intensively studied in recent years for their health effects. We are discovering that they act almost as a kind of fertilizer that assists in the growth of cells and regulation of metabolism. They also reduce certain types of inflammation.

These essential molecules are produced by movement and the increased brain and body activity created by movement. If you’re not moving about, placing heart and muscle under a bit of positive stress and strain, these molecules aren’t produced in sufficient quantities to perform their roles.

7. Pandemics & Markets: Part II – Jamie Catherwood

As news of the Spanish Flu began to spread, a September 28, 1918 issue of The Commercial and Financial Chronicle regrettably stated:

‘An epidemic of Spanish influenza has checked business to some extent, but is not expected to be lasting. The Department of Health of this city has just voted $25,000 to fight influenza, which it calls pneumonia in epidemic form. It is said to be in reality the old-fashioned grippe [flu].’

In hindsight we all know how inaccurate this prediction turned out to be, but it is mind boggling to think about how someone could think this so shortly before the Spanish Flu took the world by storm.

Well, this quote inspired me to do a little further digging into what, if any, of the major themes and questions we’re asking today were also prevalent during the Spanish Flu of 1918. Turns out there is a lot in common!


Disclaimer: The Good Investors is the personal investing blog of two simple guys who are passionate about educating Singaporeans about stock market investing. By using this Site, you specifically agree that none of the information provided constitutes financial, investment, or other professional advice. It is only intended to provide education. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or even your personal life.

What We’re Reading (Week Ending 3 May 2020)

The best articles we’ve read in recent times on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

We’ve constantly been sharing a list of our recent reads in our weekly emails for The Good Investors.

Do subscribe for our weekly updates through the orange box in the blog (it’s on the side if you’re using a computer, and all the way at the bottom if you’re using mobile) – it’s free!

But since our readership-audience for The Good Investors is wider than our subscriber base, we think sharing the reading list regularly on the blog itself can benefit even more people. The articles we share touch on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

Here are the articles for the week ending 3 May 2020:

1. 68 Bits of Unsolicited Advice – Kevin Kelly

It’s my birthday. I’m 68. I feel like pulling up a rocking chair and dispensing advice to the young ‘uns. Here are 68 pithy bits of unsolicited advice which I offer as my birthday present to all of you…

…Gratitude will unlock all other virtues and is something you can get better at…

…The more you are interested in others, the more interesting they find you. To be interesting, be interested…

… Perhaps the most counter-intuitive truth of the universe is that the more you give to others, the more you’ll get. Understanding this is the beginning of wisdom…

…Hatred is a curse that does not affect the hated. It only poisons the hater. Release a grudge as if it was a poison…

…Anything real begins with the fiction of what could be. Imagination is therefore the most potent force in the universe, and a skill you can get better at. It’s the one skill in life that benefits from ignoring what everyone else knows….

… Over the long term, the future is decided by optimists. To be an optimist you don’t have to ignore all the many problems we create; you just have to imagine improving our capacity to solve problems.

2. The Simon Abundance Index 2020 – Gale L. Pooley and Marian L. Tupy

The time price denotes the amount of time that a person has to work in order to earn enough money to buy something. To calculate the time price, the nominal money price is divided by nominal hourly income. (We got the former from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, and the latter by combining the World Bank’s GDP figures with Conference Board’s estimate of annual hours worked.) The average time price of 50 commodities fell by 74.2 percent. That means that for the same length of time that a person needed to work to earn enough money to buy one unit in our basket of 50 commodities in 1980, he or she could buy 3.87 units in 2019. In other words, the average person saw his or her level of abundance rise by 287.4 percent. That amounts to a compound annual growth rate of 3.63 percent and implies a doubling of abundance every 19.45 years (see Figure 1)…

…Simon’s revolutionary insights with regard to the mutually beneficial interaction between population growth and availability of natural resources, which our research confirms, may be counterintuitive, but they are real. The world’s resources are finite in the same way that the number of piano keys is finite. The instrument has only 88 notes, but those can be played in an infinite variety of ways. The same applies to our planet. The Earth’s atoms may be fixed, but the possible combinations of those atoms are infinite. What matters, then, is not the physical limits of our planet, but human freedom to experiment and reimagine the use of resources that we have.

3. How I Helped to Make Fischer Black Wealthier – Jay R. Ritter

By December of 1983, Donald Keim, Jeremy Siegel, myself, and many other academics (and nonacademics) took long positions in the March Value Line 1984 futures, with a short position in the March 1984 S&P 500 futures (to hedge against market movements) in order to capitalize on the turn-of-the year effect. As usual, the Value Line index outperformed the S&P 500 in early January of 1984, and we made money…

… The rest of the summer, I lost lots of money on the March-December spread as it fell from +1.80 to -1.60, but made up most of it on the September-December spread. In December, I made lots of money when the basis on the March contract was bid up by speculators anticipating the turn-of-the-year effect. But for the year as a whole, 1986 was a bad year. I lost more in the futures market than I made from my academic salary. And I decided that maybe I wasn’t an informed trader after all, but instead was one of those traders who think that they are informed, when in reality they are providing the profits to the truly informed investors.

Years later, I found out who was on the other side of the trades in the summer of 1986. It was Goldman Sachs, with Fischer Black advising the traders, that took me to the cleaners as the market moved from one pricing regime to another.

In the first four years of the Value Line futures contract, the market priced the futures using the wrong formula. After the summer of 1986, the market priced the Value Line futures using the right formula. The September 1986 issue of the Journal of Finance published an article (Eytan and Harpaz, 1986) giving the correct formula for the pricing of the Value Line futures. In the transition from one pricing regime to the other, I was nearly wiped out.

[Ser Jing here: The author (Jay R. Ritter) and Jeremy Siegel are both finance professors. Siegel, in particular, is a high-profile finance professor and the author of prominent investment books, including Stocks For The Long Run.]

4. The excess burden of death from coronavirus COVID-19 is closer to a month than to a year – Michael Levitt

The Medium post by David Spiegelhalter from the Winton Center at Cambridge University is well written and reassuring ((see https://medium.com/wintoncentre/how-much-normal-risk-does-covid-represent-4539118e1196 and attached). It concludes that if infected with COVID-19, your risk of dying is the same as the risk of dying for the coming year from natural causes. This is true for all age groups. The article is fine except it is totally wrong. The correct conclusion is that “your risk of dying is the same as the risk for the coming MONTH from natural causes.

5. When You Have No Idea What Happens Next – Morgan Housel

Accepting that forecasts have little use doesn’t mean you become a blind fatalist. When you pay more attention to history than forecasts you pick up on the patterns that guide how people respond to unforeseen events, which – given how stable behavior is over time – is the next best thing to knowing what will happen next.

I don’t know when this recession will end, and I’m not interested in your forecast. But I am interested in the historical observation that progress happens too slowly for people to notice but setbacks happen too quickly to ignore, which causes most people to recognize when a recession ended only with considerable hindsight, which requires maintaining investing optimism even when the economy around you feels broken.

6. The Coffee Can Portfolio – Budget Babe

“The potential impact of this…was brought home to me drastically as the result of an experience with one woman client. Her husband, a lawyer, handled her financial affairs and was our primary contact. I had worked with the client for about 10 years, when her husband suddenly died. She inherited his estate and called us to say that she would be adding his securities to the portfolio under our management.

When we received the list of assets, I was amused to find that he had secretly been piggy-backing our recommendations for his wife’s portfolio. Then, when I looked at the total value of the estate, I was also shocked. The husband had applied a small twist of his own to our advice: He paid no attention whatsoever to the sale recommendations. He simply put about $5,000 in every purchase recommendation. Then he would toss the certificate in his safe-deposit box and forget it.

Needless to say, he had an odd-looking portfolio. He owned a number of small holdings with values of less than $2,000. He had several large holdings with values in excess of $100,000. There was one jumbo holding worth over $800,000 that exceeded the total value of his wife’s portfolio and came from a small commitment in a company called Haloid; this later turned out to be a zillion shares of Xerox.”

7. The U.S. Needs Way More Than a Bailout to Recover From Covid-19 – Barry Ritholtz

When the stock market crashed in 1929, the Federal Reserve was a young institution with limited authority. Reviving the economy was the job of the White House and Congress. Programs such as the Works Progress Administration, in which the federal government hired workers to build more than half a million miles of streets and 10,000 bridges, along with airports, dams, highways, and sanitation systems, helped alleviate mass unemployment. However, the lasting economic gains came not from temporary work programs, but rather from the Reconstruction Finance Corp., a public-private entity better known as the RFC…

… The RFC was an enormous economic multiplier. Start with the Depression-era breakdown of the banking system. That institutional collapse wasn’t caused by a lack of capital; larger national banks such as National City Bank and Bank of America had idle cash. But low potential returns, combined with post-traumatic stress lingering from the stock crash, made bankers so risk-averse they wouldn’t even lend to each other.

The RFC’s solution in 1934 was for private bank employees to work with its subsidiary, the Federal Housing Administration, to create insurance for pools of mortgages. This led to a resurgence of financing for home purchases. Another RFC subsidiary, the Rural Electrification Administration, worked with farm cooperatives and banks to issue low-interest 20-year loans to run thousands of miles of electrical wires to rural farms and ranches—something the private sector had said would be too expensive.

During the years before World War II, the RFC created the Defense Plant Corp., offering loans and tax benefits for the manufacture of tanks, planes, and other weapons used by the Allies to fight the Nazis. The DPC helped add 50% to the country’s manufacturing capacity by the war’s end, according to Hyman. In 1940 it was responsible for 25% of the nation’s entire gross domestic product. Hyman noted that it remade the U.S. aerospace and electronics industries, turning them into some of the largest sectors in the economy.


Disclaimer: The Good Investors is the personal investing blog of two simple guys who are passionate about educating Singaporeans about stock market investing. By using this Site, you specifically agree that none of the information provided constitutes financial, investment, or other professional advice. It is only intended to provide education. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or even your personal life.

What We’re Reading (Week Ending 12 April 2020)

The best articles we’ve read in recent times on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

We’ve constantly been sharing a list of our recent reads in our weekly emails for The Good Investors.

Do subscribe for our weekly updates through the orange box in the blog (it’s on the side if you’re using a computer, and all the way at the bottom if you’re using mobile) – it’s free!

But since our readership-audience for The Good Investors is wider than our subscriber base, we think sharing the reading list regularly on the blog itself can benefit even more people. The articles we share touch on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

Here are the articles for the week ending 12 April 2020:

1. Message from Ser Jing’s friend

Last week, Ser Jing’s friend shared a list of wholesome activities we can all do to add more meaning to our lives during this difficult Circuit Breaker period. It bears repeating:

– Picking up a book that you have been wanting to read
– Taking this period of time to rest and re-calibrate yourself
– Spending quality time and doing stuffs for your loved ones
– Taking up online courses. Think Coursera and etc
– Starting up your own side line business
– Developing a new skill or hobby
– Practicing meditation, yoga and journalism to master your inner thoughts and emotions (Ser Jing meditates regularly)
– Spending some time alone in nature
– Getting in touch with your friends
– Spend time reflecting

2. The places that escaped the Spanish flu – Richard Gray

“Although they knew about the flu and did what they could to prevent it from coming, it arrived anyway,” says Katherine Ringsmuth. “The disease struck so quickly, most people didn’t have a chance to respond.” A fall in salmon stocks may have ultimately helped the Egegak village. “It was a terrible year for salmon as they had been producing so much canned salmon for the war effort in Europe, it caused the fish numbers to decline.

“It might have meant no one had any reason to visit the area. It was just chance.”

Survival, it seems, can sometimes come down to blind luck.

3. What Next? (Two Questions) – Morgan Housel

Covid-19 has separated workers into two clearly defined buckets: Those who can work from home and those who can’t.

You can break it out further into those who work for companies that can do business online and those that can’t.

In human terms, there are now flight attendants and waiters whose careers vanished overnight, and lawyers/bankers/consultants/programers who continue earning their nice salaries and benefits while in their pajamas.

That’s generalizing. There are exceptions on both sides. But it’s directionally accurate. And it’s a big deal because a key income inequality characteristic over the last three decades has been the disparity between those who work with their hands and those who work with their heads. That trend just sped up exponentially.

4. FUNDSMITH Annual Shareholders’ Meeting 25th February 2020 [link goes to video] – Fundsmith 

Ser Jing here: Fundsmith is one of the best fund management companies I know of. Its founder, CEO, and CIO (chief investment officer), Terry Smith, is one of the best fund managers I know of. In late February 2020, Fundsmith held its annual shareholders’ meeting for the investors in its funds. Smith gave a presentation and answered questions from his investors together with his team. The entire meeting was recorded on video and it is 1 hour and 30 minutes of pure investing goodness. One of my favourite parts of the video is when Smith talked about investing during recessions and the current COVID-19 crisis (watch from 34:20 onwards). 

5. My New Theory About Future Stock Market Returns – Ben Carlson

Said another way — if stocks don’t have the risk of a Great Depression-like crash on the table, does that mean expected returns should be lower going forward?

Looking at valuations over the long-term, you could make the case that the market has been pricing this in for some time now. Robert Shiller has pieced together U.S. market data going back to 1871 to calculate his cyclically-adjusted price-to-earnings ratio.

This valuation measure is far from perfect but it is telling to see how the averages have changed over time:

There is an obvious upward move in the average over time. There are a number of explanations for this increase — interest rates and inflation have fallen over time, accounting rules have changed on corporate earnings, the underlying structure of the market has changed (think more tech companies), the U.S. economy and markets are more mature, etc.

But another reason for this is the Fed now plays a larger role in the economy and management of the financial system, and thus, financial assets. If the stock market is “safer” over time, in that the Fed will do its best to smooth economic cycles, it would make sense that valuations should rise over time.

6. I Became a Disciplined Investor Over 40 Years. The Virus Broke Me in 40 Days – James B Stewart

At least I didn’t commit what Mr. Murtha considers the most serious error, which is to sell into a steep decline. “That’s where people really get hurt,” he said. “Once you’re out, the emotional leverage works against you. Either the market drops further, which confirms your fear. Or it goes up, and you don’t want to buy after you just sold. Then it gets further and further away from you. People don’t realize how hard it is to get back in.”

7. Calibrating – Howard Marks

The old saying goes, “The perfect is the enemy of the good.”  Likewise, waiting for the bottom can keep investors from making good purchases.  The investor’s goal should be to make a large number of good buys, not just a few perfect ones.  Think about your normal behavior. Before every purchase, do you insist on being sure the thing in question will never be available lower?  That is, that you’re buying at the bottom? I doubt it. You probably buy because you think you’re getting a good asset at an attractive price.  Isn’t that enough? And I trust you sell because you think the selling price is adequate or more, not because you’re convinced the price can never go higher.  To insist on buying only at bottoms and selling only at tops would be paralyzing…

…The bottom line for me is that I’m not at all troubled saying (a) markets may well be considerably lower sometime in the coming months and (b) we’re buying today when we find good value.  I don’t find these statements inconsistent.


Disclaimer: The Good Investors is the personal investing blog of two simple guys who are passionate about educating Singaporeans about stock market investing. By using this Site, you specifically agree that none of the information provided constitutes financial, investment, or other professional advice. It is only intended to provide education. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or even your personal life.

What We’re Reading (Week Ending 5 April 2020)

The best articles we’ve read in recent times on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

We’ve constantly been sharing a list of our recent reads in our weekly emails for The Good Investors.

Do subscribe for our weekly updates through the orange box in the blog (it’s on the side if you’re using a computer, and all the way at the bottom if you’re using mobile) – it’s free!

But since our readership-audience for The Good Investors is wider than our subscriber base, we think sharing the reading list regularly on the blog itself can benefit even more people. The articles we share touch on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

Here are the articles for the week ending 5 April 2020:

1. Message from Ser Jing’s friend

Ser Jing’s friend recently sent a wonderful text message on a list of wholesome activities we can all do during these difficult times to still add grace, beauty, purpose, and meaning to our lives:

– Picking up a book that you have been wanting to read
– Taking this period of time to rest and re-calibrate yourself
– Spending quality time and doing stuffs for your loved ones
– Taking up online courses. Think Coursera and etc
– Starting up your own side line business
– Developing a new skill or hobby
– Practicing meditation, yoga and journalism to master your inner thoughts and emotions [Ser Jing meditates regularly]
– Spending some time alone in nature
– Getting in touch with your friends
– Spend time reflecting

2. A Coronavirus Fix That Passes the Smell Test – Michael Lewis

Encourage everyone in the world with access to the internet to report whether they can or cannot smell. Make it easy for them to do so. Find widely admired people with big social-media followings to make short videos on the subject — at the bottom of which there’d be a simple button that allows anyone watching to report their sense of smell. Go viral with the virus [COVID-19]. Before long you’d have a pile of data that smart analysts could use to map it, and evaluate its risks. The results might not be perfect, but they were far better than what we have now in any rich country and far better than what they might ever have in countries with fewer resources.

I love this idea. Hancock is well on his way to building an organization to make it happen — the website is sniffoutcovid.org. He is in the market for both widely admired people and data scientists.  Here’s to hoping he finds them before my father calls me to say that he can no longer smell his Burgundy.

3. Great Love & Great Suffering – Josh Radnor

I have noted in myself a kind of reflexive optimism (i.e. “This is going to be okay,” “We’ll get through this,”) of which I’m becoming suspicious. Do I just feel that way because I’ve been inoculated by my privilege? Surely this is going to be calamitous for many people – far beyond the sick and the dying – and I don’t want to turn a blind eye toward that suffering: the suddenly unemployed and homeless, the relapsing addict and those that love them, those trapped in abusive and unsafe homes, etc.

It feels like this moment is asking me to grow up, to stop relying on false-hope granting platitudes and accept that pain, suffering, and grief are part of the birthright of being a human being. I say that with the full knowledge and deep belief that love, joy, laughter, and art are also part of that birthright. Light and shadow are inextricably bound up with each other and it’s naïve to think that darkness can be vanquished or banished in favor of everlasting light. That’s magical thinking of a kind to which I refuse to subscribe.

4. The Greatest Investment Quotes of All Time – Nick Maggiulli

“If you’re not willing to react with equanimity to a market price decline of 50% two or three times a century, you’re not fit to be a common shareholder and you deserve the mediocre result you’re going to get.”
-Charlie Munger,
Interview with BBC

“Investing should be more like watching paint dry or watching grass grow. If you want excitement, take $800 and go to Las Vegas.”
– Paul Samuelson

“I tell my father’s story of the gambler who lost regularly.  One day he hears about a race with only one horse in it, so he bet the rent money.  Halfway around the track, the horse jumped over the fence and ran away.”
-Howard Marks,
The Most Important Thing

5. The Corona Crisis vs. The Great Depression – Ben Carlson

However, there are a number of differences between 1929-1932 and its aftermath and the current situation.

The Fed. The Federal Reserve was still relatively new during the Great Depression, having been founded just 16 years prior. Not only did they pour gasoline on the fire during the speculative period leading up to the crash, but they did next to nothing in trying to stop the crisis as it was unfolding.

John Kenneth Galbraith once wrote, “The Federal Reserve Board in those times was a body of startling incompetence.”

In the current crisis, the Fed has acted fast and they’ve gone big. Central banks around the globe have pumped liquidity into the system to make sure the plumbing of the financial markets continues to function.

This was not happening during the Great Depression and it’s one of the reasons there was a run on the banks and a huge number of bank failures.

Government Spending. During a severe economic contraction, individuals and corporations spend less money so it’s typically up to the government to make up for this shortfall.

During the Great Depression, they did the opposite. Republicans and Democrats alike sought to balance the budget and cut spending. Even in 1932, at the depths of the depression, they wanted to shrink government spending by 25%.

Today, we’re getting $2 trillion in fiscal stimulus rescue funds plus another $4 trillion in loans from the Fed. It’s likely we’ll need even more government spending depending on how long it takes to beat the virus.

6. Why does Covid-19 get the blame when Eagle Hospitality Trust’s woes predate it? – Marissa Lee

UC’s fixed payments were supposed to account for 66 per cent of EHT’s projected rental income in 2020, though the US lodging market began to weaken in the second half of last year. EHT’s revenue for 2019 came in 10 per cent lower than forecast. On Feb 17, 2020, a week before the US confirmed its first case of local Covid-19 transmission, UC amended the master lease agreements to allow EHT to receive more rent from any hotels that produce excess cash ow, to make up for shortfalls in any underperforming hotels.

The master lease agreements also formed the basis for EHT’s adopted valuations of its hotels.

According to EHT’s oer document, UC was required to hand over a US$43.7 million security deposit to EHT during the IPO, equivalent to nine months of fixed rent. UC funded US$23.7 million in cash, and indicated in the offer document that it would provide the balance of US$20 million by way of a letter of credit on or around EHT’s listing on May 24, 2019.

After EHT’s IPO, most investors assumed that the full US$43.7 million was safely in escrow, until they were told differently on March 19, 2020.

What they learnt is that UC had used US$5 million in cash to top up its security deposit to US$28.7 million, though it still had not managed to procure a letter of credit for the remaining US$15 million of the US$43.7 million.

7. The Shock Cycle – Morgan Housel

Then you ignore good news because you’re once bitten, twice shy. Avoiding further downside becomes such a focus that you lack the mental bandwidth to even recognize good news.

Then you deny good news. You’re so attuned to risk that you reflexively think good news must be wrong or out of context. Anyone promoting good news is criticized by the masses, who enjoy safety in numbers.

Then you realize you missed the good news. In hindsight you realize things turned a corner while people were most certain about how bad it was. You look back and can’t believe how obvious it was that people were too pessimistic, and can’t believe clear the signs of improvement were.


Disclaimer: The Good Investors is the personal investing blog of two simple guys who are passionate about educating Singaporeans about stock market investing. By using this Site, you specifically agree that none of the information provided constitutes financial, investment, or other professional advice. It is only intended to provide education. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or even your personal life.

What We’re Reading (Week Ending 29 March 2020)

The best articles we’ve read in recent times on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

We’ve constantly been sharing a list of our recent reads in our weekly emails for The Good Investors.

Do subscribe for our weekly updates through the orange box in the blog (it’s on the side if you’re using a computer, and all the way at the bottom if you’re using mobile) – it’s free!

But since our readership-audience for The Good Investors is wider than our subscriber base, we think sharing the reading list regularly on the blog itself can benefit even more people. The articles we share touch on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

Here are the articles for the week ending 29 March 2020:

1. Wounds Heal, Scars Last – Morgan Housel

When people feel the correlation between their decisions and their outcomes is high, there’s less desire for a strong social safety net. But when something impacts everyone at once, and can ruin the careful as much as the reckless, there’s a history of people coming together to support a public backstop. We saw that Wednesday, when a $2 trillion rescue package passed the Senate 96-0. I suspect we’ll be seeing more of it for years to come.

2. Why the Stock Market Rallies on Bad News [link goes to video] – The Compound

Michael [Batnick] and Barry [Ritholtz] discuss the latest record-breaking unemployment numbers and why the market is rallying on this bad news? What is going on?

3. What we learn from the past – Samuel Rhee

The markets were down almost 50% and everybody had lost their shirt. We worried we wouldn’t have any money to manage when all was said and done. And more importantly we thought we would all soon be out of a job. We were desperate for some guidance and sage advice from Barton. I asked him, “Barton – is this the worst thing you’ve ever seen?” He paused and thought for a moment, then he slowly opened his mouth. His answer was completely unexpected to everybody in the room. He said, “to be honest, I think 1974 was much worse.” We all turned to each other and looked around the room and asked. Wait what? 1974?

4. Stock Market Commentary: Confront the brutal facts, yet never lose faith – Chuin Ting Weber

So we keep the faith amidst the brutal facts in the short term, because the faith in our long-term destiny is ultimately our faith in humanity’s ability to overcome, as we have done in the past. Once again, our economies will grow on the back of human innovation, industry and our collective and relentless pursuit of a better life. Together, or probably preceding this, the stock market will go up again. We do not know exactly how long the pain would last or when the upturn would come, but come it definitely will!

5. How Did We Ever Get to The Roaring Twenties? – Ben Carlson

It’s also hard to believe the U.S. was ever able to pick itself up off the turf to make the Roaring 20s happen in the first place. Let’s go through a list of what occurred in the lead up to one of the biggest boom times in our country’s history:

World War I (1914-1918)Influenza Pandemic (1918-1919)Post-War Recession (1918-1919)The Depression (1920-1921)… This 8 or so years looks like hell on earth:

And yet…look at what came during the aftermath.

6. What If You Buy Stocks Too Early During a Market Crash? – Ben Carlson

I know of a professional trader who foresaw the Great Recession, went to cash in the summer of 2008 before things got crazy and came up with a wonderful plan to put his money back to work at the lows.

He planned on putting his cash into a simple S&P 500 index fund in 25% chunks when the S&P hit 650, 600, 550, and finally 500. It was a generational buying opportunity and I was jealous he had such a wonderful plan of attack.

The only problem with this plan is the S&P never got to those levels, even though plenty of people were predicting it at the time.

The S&P hit an intraday low of 666, he put his cash to work and ended up never getting back in. He assumed the initial bounce was of the dead cat variety and a double-dip recession would give him another opportunity to buy but stocks never looked back.

I’m not sure many investors sitting in cash or bonds at the moment are worried about being too late. Those with dry powder left are far more concerned with being too early, as most assume things will only get worse.


Disclaimer: The Good Investors is the personal investing blog of two simple guys who are passionate about educating Singaporeans about stock market investing. By using this Site, you specifically agree that none of the information provided constitutes financial, investment, or other professional advice. It is only intended to provide education. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or even your personal life.

What We’re Reading (Week Ending 22 March 2020)

The best articles we’ve read in recent times on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

This is the first time we’re publishing on The Good Investors the best articles we’ve read in recent times. We’ve constantly been sharing a list of our recent reads in our weekly emails.

Do subscribe for our weekly updates through the orange box in the blog (it’s on the side if you’re using a computer, and all the way at the bottom if you’re using mobile) – it’s free!

But since our readership-audience for The Good Investors is wider than our subscriber base, we think sharing the reading list regularly on the blog itself can benefit even more people. The articles we share touch on a wide range of topics, including investing, business, and the world in general.

Here are the articles for the week ending 22 March 2020:

1. Coronavirus: The Hammer and the Dance – Tomas Pueyo

When you’re done reading the article, this is what you’ll take away:

Our healthcare system is already collapsing.
Countries have two options: either they fight it hard now, or they will suffer a massive epidemic.
If they choose the epidemic, hundreds of thousands will die. In some countries, millions.
And that might not even eliminate further waves of infections.
If we fight hard now, we will curb the deaths.
We will relieve our healthcare system.
We will prepare better.
We will learn.
The world has never learned as fast about anything, ever.
And we need it, because we know so little about this virus.
All of this will achieve something critical: Buy Us Time.

If we choose to fight hard, the fight will be sudden, then gradual.
We will be locked in for weeks, not months.
Then, we will get more and more freedoms back.
It might not be back to normal immediately.
But it will be close, and eventually back to normal.
And we can do all that while considering the rest of the economy too.

Ok, let’s do this.

2. Common Enemies – Morgan Housel

Fritz’s theory was that modern society has gravely disrupted the social bonds that have always characterized the human experience, and that disasters thrust people back into a more ancient, organic way of relating. Disasters, he proposed, create a “community of sufferers” that allows individuals to experience an immensely reassuring connection to others.

As people come together to face an existential threat, Fritz found, class differences are temporarily erased, income disparities become irrelevant, race is overlooked, and individuals are assessed simply by what they are willing to do for the group. It is a kind of fleeting social utopia that, Fritz felt, is enormously gratifying to the average person and downright therapeutic to people suffering from mental illness.

3. The world after coronavirus – Yuval Noah Harrari

In this time of crisis, we face two particularly important choices. The first is between totalitarian surveillance and citizen empowerment. The second is between nationalist isolation and global solidarity…

The coronavirus epidemic is thus a major test of citizenship. In the days ahead, each one of us should choose to trust scientific data and healthcare experts over unfounded conspiracy theories and self-serving politicians. If we fail to make the right choice, we might find ourselves signing away our most precious freedoms, thinking that this is the only way to safeguard our health…

Humanity needs to make a choice. Will we travel down the route of disunity, or will we adopt the path of global solidarity? If we choose disunity, this will not only prolong the crisis, but will probably result in even worse catastrophes in the future. If we choose global solidarity, it will be a victory not only against the coronavirus, but against all future epidemics and crises that might assail humankind in the 21st century.

4. The Power of the Human Spirit – Ben Carlson

World War II was the first war where airplanes would play a major role and [Winston] Churchill was worried the Germans would bomb London. The population of the city at that time was something in the range of 8-9 million people.

Churchill was convinced as many as 3-4 million people would take shelter in the countryside, thus more or less completely shutting down the city. Others predicted mass panic in the streets, refusal by many to continue working and hundreds of thousands of deaths.

Churchills warnings proved prescient but not necessarily the outcome of the bombings.

Germany did bomb London mercilessly in 1940 and 1941. The blitz included targeted airstrikes on supply chains, industrial targets, and the city at large. The plan of attack for the Germans was to demoralize the British population, bombing them day and night for 8 months, including 57 days in a row at the outset.

Tens of thousands of bombs were dropped. Forty thousand people were killed and another forty-six thousand injured. Buildings all across the region were damaged or destroyed. Entire neighborhoods were decimated. More than a million people lost their homes.

The British government had set up psychiatric hospitals outside of the city in preparation for the toll these bombings would take on their citizens.

They sat empty.

In the face of a war that was literally brought to their doorsteps, the majority of the people in London never panicked.

5. Random Thoughts on the Crash As We Catch Our Breath – Ben Carlson

There are 156 companies that are down 40% or more this year. Eighty-six stocks are down at least 50%. And 40 have fallen 70% or worse this year alone.

You’ll recognize many of the industries represented here — airlines, cruise companies, casinos and energy stocks — as being the hardest hit. These companies are in the midst of a once-in-a-lifetime downturn.

Michael and I have received a number of questions from podcast listeners about the max amount they should keep in their company’s stock when it comes to retirement. There’s no perfect number but the answer is probably a number low enough that a 70%-80% decline doesn’t ruin your entire retirement plan.

Boeing is down roughly 70% in 2020.

United Airlines has fallen nearly 76%.

MGM is down 77%.

Royal Caribbean is down more than 83%.

The first quarter isn’t even over yet.

I’m sure there are plenty of employees who held all or most of their retirement assets in their company’s stock. They’re now living through Great Depression-level losses and who knows if these stocks are ever going to fully recover.

For every Amazon that makes their employees wealthy beyond their dreams, there are always going to be situations like this where companies get destroyed.

6. How to Fight Hindsight Bias – Michael Batnick

The situation worsens in terms of the virus spreading and its effect on the economy. This seems like fait accompli at this point, but maybe the market, even down 30%, still has not properly discounted what’s to come. We’ll look back in amazement at the levels of complacency and in some cases outright denial.

Or

The virus passes through our system quicker than expected, and the market has already discounted the worst case scenario. Stocks recover most or all of their losses over the next few months, quarters or possibly years. We’ll look back in amazement at the time when stocks fell 30% in a few weeks because of a temporary slowdown in the economy.

At this point, I wouldn’t be surprised if either scenario plays out. The problem is that whatever comes to pass will appear obvious after the fact.

“Well so what?” you might be wondering. Why is it a problem? Hindsight bias is a problem because it leads to overconfidence, which leads to more risk taking, which leads to bad decisions, which leads to lower returns.


Disclaimer: The Good Investors is the personal investing blog of two simple guys who are passionate about educating Singaporeans about stock market investing. By using this Site, you specifically agree that none of the information provided constitutes financial, investment, or other professional advice. It is only intended to provide education. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or even your personal life.

The Good Investors X Seedly: Win A Trip To Bali!

The Good Investors is collaborating with personal finance portal Seedly to give its community-users a chance to win a trip to Bali!

We at The Good Investors are pleased to announce a partnership with the Singapore-based personal finance portal, Seedly, in a campaign called Seedly Secret Santa. The campaign aims to build an active stocks discussion community in Singapore. 

It will last from 2 December 2019 to 24 December 2019 and offers participants a chance to win a 3-day 2-night all-expense trip for 2 to Bali

Seedly is a community-driven platform that aims to help Singaporeans make better financial decisions.

To take part in this The Good Investors X Seedly campaign, follow the Stocks Discussion community and be among the top 10 members as of 24 December 2019. You move up the rankings by asking questions (1 point), receiving upvotes (2 points per upvote), and answering questions (3 points). Better answers get more upvotes! 

We hope to see you at Seedly’s campaign – and win the grand prize while you’re at it!

Best of luck!
The Good Investors